To paraphrase Jung, “It is the revolt of the powerless, the insatiable greed of the have-nots, and they are likely to gravitate toward powerful collective ideologies, mass movements, and institutions.”
A friend is currently taking a leadership class at her workplace and interestingly, someone fairly high up in her organization, way above her, is also attending. He proudly boasted of being a Capitalist and made statements typical of that worldview, such as, “If people are not happy what they are doing then I believe they should go where they will be happy. I want them to be happy.” In other words, if people disagree with the way he is overworking them (and she said he is definitely doing that) they can go to hell. Classic.
In the 20th century the three main ideologies in play were Communism, Fascism, and Capitalism. Communists had been scheming throughout most of the 19th century in response to the misery generated by the industrial revolution. The essential question concerning the human condition for millennia has been inequality, and at the turn of the last century, the Russian Revolution, the long awaited rising up of the worker, came about. The previous systems of aristocracies warring on each other, compounded by religious persecutions, had inevitably culminated in this anarchy brought on by industrial excesses. The resultant reordering of governments began near the end of the 18th century with the relatively successful American Revolution and disappointing French Revolution. The ancient Greek ideas of Democracy and Roman ideas of Republic were revived and codified in new declarations.
Communism was based on doing away with the question of inequality by doing away with inequality itself. Communism addressed property and this resulted in a totalitarianism whose main feature was poverty, famine, and concentration camps. Such camps, unknown to most people today, had been recently invented by the British to end the Boer War. Fascism was next and addressed race, or blood, as the measure of Darwinian inequality and this resulted in a totalitarianism whose main feature was genocide and extermination camps. Capitalism, which had run rampant by way of robber barons through most of the 19th century, was put on a leash in the U.S. after the 1929 crash by socialist forces, and this resulted in what has been described as “imbedded liberalism.” And then came the second World War.
The salient feature of Capitalism is, of course, greed. Or, instead of just naming that deadly sin, the code word “freedom” is often substituted. After World War Two the resulting Keynesian hybrid of a Capitalism carefully regulated by the state made America great. Communism was the great atheist enemy and the horrors of Fascism made these ideologies anathema but, unfortunately, Capitalism in its purest unrestrained Darwinian form, is now again dominant- and may destroy the planet.
The Robber Barons have returned but the industrial revolution is now running in reverse with jobs disappearing due to artificial intelligence replacing the minimal human oversight and basic hands-on required for automated systems. The industrial revolution grew by leaps and bounds in the immense market that was the world and now there is no more immensity to exploit. The only “resource” left to exploit is humanity itself.
The cult of Neoliberalism is a pernicious cult because it so blatantly makes money the god of this world. Everything must be made to turn a profit. The only commodity left to exploit becomes human labor in a kind of relational cannibalism. Populations must eventually be turned as close as possible back into those slaves that built the ancient world. Today, the day Trump was acquitted and Spartacus died, has shown the politicians to be true worshipers of Mammon. There is no longer any doubt.
There will be no second space age as long as there is a dollar to be made by NOT expanding humankind into the solar system. Future generations may mark this day as the one far more infamous than any in the 20th century.
The Doomsday Clock has been advanced and a possible global pandemic is spreading. And…there is the subject of Space Based Solar Power as the cure for climate change, which is just as important as Mutually Assured Destruction and another black death. Existential threats are a recurring theme on this blog as the reason space exploration and colonization should be the penultimate collective concern of the human race. The very first priority, which I have repeatedly stated, is a way to freeze human beings without damage. I am sure this puzzles some of my readers (I actually had ten visitors the other day!). Let me explain.
I am a not very impressive example of the human race and I understand that. Compared to someone like Laurel Blair Salton Clark, who was born about 6 months after I was, I am…not impressive.
image NASA
I remember happening upon a bio of her and how her amazing life story affected me. I have called myself a “simple machine” and likely this is the only facet of my existence that makes me remarkable in any way. My basic design might allow me to see our situation in a way you do not, and come to a conclusion that others simply cannot see through the clutter and structure of the human condition. It is with perfect clarity I see our problem as “simple” to troubleshoot. The Flow Chart only has a few branches. The Solution Box reads, “Freeze All Humans At Risk without damage to be Revived At No Risk years later.”
image Prometheus movie
I can expound on why this is the ultimate and immediate priority ahead of avoiding nuclear war, stopping a global pandemic, and curing climate change, but there seems to be some psychological mechanism that disallows human understanding. How do I remove that block? Nobody seems to get it.
image telegraph.co.uk
We are all on death row in this open air prison called Earth and in denial. Our sentence will be carried out in the near future. The philosopher Nietzsche spoke of fear and laziness as basic to human existence and adding on the interchangeable terms of denial and stupidity to the beginning makes for a convincing chain of cause and effect. We deny what we cannot accept and this failure is in reality a failure of intelligence. We are not as smart as we believe ourselves to be and all are lost in the forest but for the trees.
As I often write, an alien intelligence observing our extinction would not be surprised and conclude we were too stupid to survive.
As long as we are being marched to the gas chamber as individuals we are doomed as a species. Stopping death, at least delaying it indefinitely, is the turning point in human history where we go from being an ephemeron species to survivors. There are few technical challenges to inhibiting disruption of microstructures undergoing temperature change. And fewer dollars being spent on effecting that process.
What stupid creatures we are. But then again, no. Consider those who are intelligent enough to see another path…like David R. Criswell. He rightly points out that for the mind-boggling amount of money we have spent since 2001 on fighting in the Middle East we could be well on the way to turning the Moon into a giant solar energy plant to power Earth. But instead of leaders who support such a bright future we have the… disappointment of the stable genius. Such mind-numbingly idiotic politicians could very well spell the end of the human race.
And the worst part of it all is that most of the people I work with in my conservative shop think our biggest problem is the unemployed getting free stuff from the government.
Our only hope is going back to a Keynesian model that works.
I recently heard an author writing about the U.S. say in an interview, “The truth is out there and trust no one. ” It was meant in the same sense as the old joke, “it is not my fault I am an other-blamer.” The theme of this Ice on the Moon entry is how humans constantly lower the likelihood of surviving as a species through the practice of deceit. I went to the wiki Space Launch System (SLS) page last night and found it to have been so obviously spun by NewSpace that it was disgusting. Now for some words on this unhappy state-
Perhaps the best answer to the Ayn-Rand-in-Space fans critical of the SLS is to simply talk about what just three new DOD weapon systems are going to cost. First…understand these weapons will accomplish nothing except to threaten our world with Armageddon. For decades to come they will only exist to destroy civilization if an all-out nuclear attack is launched against the United States. As you will see, the price of peace is very high.
The replacement for the Ohio class missile submarine: “The total lifecycle cost of the entire class is estimated at $347 billion.[10] The high cost of the submarines is expected to cut deeply into Navy shipbuilding.[12]”
The B-21 stealth bomber, which will replace the B-52 and B-2: “The Air Force initial plans were to acquire 80 to 100 LRS-B aircraft at a cost of $550 million per unit (2010) and envisions some 175 to 200 to be in service eventually.[8][9]” I could find no “total lifecycle cost” but just buying them, let alone operating them, will run over 100 billion.
The replacement cost for the Minuteman ICBM is going up: “The Pentagon’s Cost Assessment and Program Evaluation office previously estimated the total cost of the program as anywhere from $85 billion to $100 billion.” In addition there is Reagan’s Star Wars legacy Ballistic Missile Defense (BMD) program, which is hard to pin down, but missile defense in various forms will cost well over 100 billion over the next decade, and more than likely double that.
The first figure of approximately 350 billion as the total cost for 12 new submarines might just as well be applied to bombers, missiles, and warning systems, and this tends to confirm as accurate the many estimates of over a trillion dollars to modernize our strategic deterrent in this decade alone. Again, this does nothing but guarantee the destruction of civilization in the event of a nuclear war. “Nuclear” is the key term and more on this in a moment.
Neoliberalism continues to take control of the world, the examples of which are Bezos, Gates, and Buffet having more wealth than half the population of the U.S. combined. As long as “entrepreneurs” like Elon Musk continue to manipulate the economic system to further their hobbies there will be no progress toward an insurance policy for humankind. In the past I have often used the term “Orwellian” to describe NewSpace due to Musk advancing his vision of a second home for humankind when nothing could be further from the truth. Mars was ruled out as a second home early in the space colonization movement for the obvious reasons. Not enough Solar Energy, no Earth Gravity (only possible with artificial worlds) and Nuclear Energy are all why Mars is a scam. NewSpace is a confidence game peddling shiny starships and space junk.
wiki image
Nuclear technology is the key enabler for expanding humankind into space and only state-sponsored projects on the scale of the Panama Canal or the Hoover Dam will be allowed to use atomic energy. No private permits are going to be issued for craft carrying a couple thousand nuclear devices (bombs) and pulse propulsion is the only practical interplanetary propulsion system that will be available for a long time to come.
In the linked interview Chris Hedges talks about Christian fascists in America and how “Jesus did not come to make us rich.” Heretical preachers and the pernicious drive to corrupt all things beneficial so only the few can benefit will result, if left unchecked, in the destruction of our species. It is as if those ocean moons conceal monstrous super-intelligent beings influencing our minds from across space- manipulating us and insuring our destruction. H.P. Lovecraft would have wrote his stories set in different locales if he were alive today. This world continues to deteriorate as concurrent political corruption and climate change run their course.
One of a couple dozen projects I have never undertaken is to edit a foreign-dubbed version of “Fantastic Voyage” with subtitles that change the story. The new mission would not be inside a human body but inside an ocean moon or icy body that is acrually a single or group super-brain. Again, I get the feeling we are so messed up as a species that we must be under the influence of some ultra-entity to be so destined for self-destruction.
image from parigi books
At this moment in history, truth is on trial. Not for the first time. In 1974 the checks and balances and a free press worked and the most powerful leader on Earth resigned before being removed from office. The same leader who effectively ended the U.S. drive to expand humankind into space.
“Nixon was unwilling to keep funding for the National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA) at the high level seen during the 1960s as NASA prepared to send men to the Moon. NASA Administrator Thomas O. Paine drew up ambitious plans for the establishment of a permanent base on the Moon by the end of the 1970s and the launch of a manned expedition to Mars as early as 1981. Nixon rejected both proposals due to the expense.[204] Nixon also canceled the Air Force Manned Orbital Laboratory program in 1969, because unmanned spy satellites were a more cost-effective way to achieve the same reconnaissance objective.[205] NASA cancelled the last three planned Apollo lunar missions to place Skylab in orbit more efficiently and free money up for the design and construction of the Space Shuttle.[206]”
Image: NASA
Of those four actions condoned by Nixon regarding space exploration, rejection of a Mars expedition was the only one that would ultimately make sense. Mars, like Low Earth Orbit (LEO), was and is a dead end. Ending visits to the Moon by stopping Saturn V production instead of funding further development to make the vehicle partially reusable like the Shuttle was the really bad mistake, along with the Shuttle program itself. As his predecessor Johnson had feared, the great capability of the Saturn V Super Heavy Lift Vehicle (SHLV) was “pissed away.”
Manned platforms were the best option in terms of Missile Early Warning and keeping the cold war cold but only in Geostationary Earth Orbit and this was a problem. Such “True Space Stations”, touched on by Arthur C. Clarke in his book “The Promise of Space”, were not going to happen without a base on the Moon. This, as the Parker-Dyson-Spudis Continuum makes clear, is only practical with cosmic ray water shielding brought up from the lunar poles. It would seem we have failed to learn anything by our mistakes.
The second time truth went on trial, a quarter century after Nixon, the most powerful leader on Earth should have resigned or been thrown out for being a liar. He was not, after having sold his soul and his party to the god of this world, Mammon. And now, another 20 years later, with that god in control and the 1st amendment crippled (in blatantly Orwellian fashion with “fake news”) the future is not bright. The film maker Michael Moore has said however, there is “a sliver of a chance.” We will see.
In conclusion, I would like to relate a personal experience that might clarify the message I am trying to deliver. In the mid 90’s the big management fad was Total Quality Management (TQM). It came to us mandated and when I was informed I would be getting so many hours of this training I went to the library and read up on it. I read a lot of books back then, at least one a week and sometimes more. Not so much now. I read about the success of the Japanese auto industry by way of TQM and became a believer. Then came the training my organization gave and the big disappointment. The people in charge had decided TQM was a little too radical and watered it down. This, of course, was what Mr. Deming specifically warned against and violated the 2nd of his 14 points. I challenged our instructor on this and was told be quiet and ask no more questions… or leave.
We are all being deceived in some way by a minority of sociopaths at every level of human existence. This is what is going to make us one more silent question mark in the Fermi Paradox. We blindly imitate these creatures and they take advantage of that lack of vision to build on their collective scheme. The Military Industrial Complex, the Medical Industrial Complex (which charges twice as much as any other country) and the Media Industrial Complex, all have us headed toward extinction. Space is the way to escape the trap of our stupidity, our escape from stupid-world. A trillion dollars for a Green New Deal with Space Solar Power as the cure for climate change is that escape. Moving the nuclear deterrent months away into deep space is one way to move in that direction.
I had a spark of hope some years ago when I read Jeff Bezos was looking for a Saturn V F-1 engine in the ocean. What was that all about? It made me wonder if he was actually going to build that piece of hardware so critical to Human Space Flight Beyond Earth Orbit (HSF-BEO). An engine in the 2 million pound thrust range is the basic requirement for a Super Heavy Lift Vehicle (SHLV). Perhaps it might be more accurate to say in the 4 million pound thrust range when considering a single turbopump driving a pair of 2 million pound thrust bells would be even better. This item is of course nowhere to be seen. Instead, we have clusters of smaller engines adding complexity and killing that K.I.S.S. feature so desirable in a SHLV. A sustainable HSF-BEO program must have these “fewer-bigger” engines.
There are essentially two approaches to building a partially reusable SHLV and the 1981 Space Shuttle went with the “big dumb booster” concept being parachuted into the ocean and recovered at sea.
The NewSpace flagship company has demonstrated a redux of the 1993 Delta Clipper and landed back the first stage of their hobby rocket and this second Vertical Take-off/ Vertical landing (VTVL) approach is now seen as more efficient. Whether it is actually cheaper to land back instead of dropping the hardware in the ocean remains to be seen as those numbers are not made public. Far more powerful Aerojet monolithic solid fuel boosters might have made the Space Shuttle more of a success but that did not happen. A separate engine module with some kind of VTVL recovery system combined with different boosters would have definitely seem the Shuttle system still in use with no end in sight.
This “should have been” Space Shuttle is somewhat like the SLS in that it would have been a vertical stack putting different payloads on top. Not putting the payload on top was the worst feature of the Shuttle design. If the Orbiter had turned out to be a bad idea, which in hindsight it absolutely was, then NASA could have gone back to a capsule. With reusable liquid fuel boosters and a VTVL RS-26 module detaching from the core tank the SLS could become essentially what the Space Shuttle should have been. Over half a century ago in 1969 serious design work began on the Space Shuttle and now we have a new expendable Saturn V instead of what should have been developed then. I do not think Blue Origin is doing much better simply because they made that first cardinal mistake of not developing a powerful enough 1st stage engine. Now a word on O’Neill.
Gerard K. O’Neill was a visionary who led teams of smart young people to a set of simple conclusions explaining the best path for expanding humankind into the solar system. The goal was improving our species quality of life and prospects for avoiding extinction in the immediate future. The first conclusion was that living in space instead of on Earth is indeed the practical solution to almost all the problems humanity was dealing with in the 60’s and 70’s and to this day, including climate change. The second conclusion was that no other natural bodies in the solar system are likely to be practical as a second home for humanity leaving only space habitats. The third conclusion was that Space Based Solar Power (SBSP) is the ideal economic engine to build space infrastructure and enable the mass production of miles-in-diameter-artificial-spinning-hollow-moons.
Having mentioned an “economic engine” and inferred the involvement of NewSpace by headlining Blue, which is ostensibly a NewSpace company, I now have to point out Jeff Bezos appears to be riding a neoliberal wave that is in reality a stumbling block to space colonization. This is bad news but not all bad. Billionaire hobbyists are wasteful but then the nature of capitalism and competition is a severely inefficient process. If one of them can get just one thing right then it might make up for all of the damage already done. This ruinous ideology has already set space exploration back at least a decade and that wreckage is accumulating. The primary villain in this story is not Bezos, not yet. It is the other one.
There is no cheap. Smaller rockets using fuel depots are not the miracle that makes everything easy. Mars is not the second home of humanity. Shiny starships and tens of thousands of pieces of space junk are not the future. “Entrepreneurs” are not going to expand humankind into the solar system. This Ayn-Rand-in-Space neoliberal ideology is poison to any progress and all of it is in fact the opposite and enemy of space advocacy. Since the company is using O’Neill’s name on their headquarters, let me make my “O’Neillian views” crystal clear for the leadership at Blue Origin;
Only state sponsored public works projects on the scale of the Panama Canal and Hoover Dam can succeed in expanding humankind into the solar system and effecting an insurance policy against the threat of extinction. Nuclear Pulse Propulsion is a prerequisite and by itself precludes entrepreneurship.
The Public-private Partnership is a guarantee of failure in regards to space exploration as evidenced by the failure of the Space Shuttle, which was sold as a commercial launcher that would “pay for itself.” In contrast, Apollo closely controlled the design and production of the Saturn V and did succeed.
The profit motive is poison to the survival imperative as insurance against extinction is the over-arching goal of space exploration and colonization. While contracted private companies operate to turn a profit this completely corrupts space exploration when the goal becomes exploiting space ONLY for profit.
In my view two New Glenn lower stages could likely replace the present SLS 5 segment SRB’s and this would enable a 150 metric ton payload, even with a stretched SLS core stage modified to allow the RS-25 engine section to separate from the tank structure and VTVL back. As stated at the beginning of this entry, the pressing need is for much larger liquid fuel engines and future SLS boosters should have at most 4 large thrust bells and a central smaller engine for steering and landing. Likewise the core stage tankage might eventually be replaced with a tile-shielded tank like the shiny starship and land back the entire structure. The major stumbling block is the no-escape-system-shiny-starship and tens of thousands of pieces of space junk snake oil now being sold to the public.
What nobody gets is that VTVL and bringing back the second stage are old ideas. Philip Bono of Douglas Aircraft proposed several VTVL vehicles in the early 60’s and the Delta Clipper accomplished VTVL in the early 90’s. Among the first Space Shuttle design concepts in the late 60’s was a winged first stage and second stage with both returning for reuse. It is a farce that the NewSpace flagship company is taking credit for what was done or concepts originated many decades ago- as if it all came straight from the mind of the great one himself. The crew dragon and starship are fundamentally flawed and are following the cheap and nasty path to failure, as shown by the explosion of the former. NASA would be crazy to risk people on a small capsule packed with a ton and a half of hypergolics.
As I continue to relate on this blog, LEO and Mars are both complete dead ends and need to be abandoned in favor of total commitment to a lunar return. I will not go into my disdain for suborbital tourism and instead hope Blue goes forward with Landers incorporating the technology and their tourism enterprise is seen for the very bad idea it is and ends.
About four and one half years ago one of my first blog entries was “Amazon Women on the Moon.” At that time I inferred a new military service, a “Space Navy” would best be composed of young women in the interest of effecting Survival Colonies on the Moon. I have not changed my mind on this. With an embryo bank of fertilized ovum available a wild guess at the number of females required to rebuild the human race would be a few hundred. With a sperm bank the number of females required goes up. With males and females in pairs this would likely increase to a couple thousand if interbreeding problems are to be avoided. The number of females necessary and how to sustain them off-world is an interesting problem. Our newest graduating class of astronauts, nicknamed “the turtles”, has six females and seven males.
Image by Mark Felix
This is the extremely important question: if Earth is suddenly uninhabitable could the human race survive? If an asteroid or comet several times the size of the previous dinosaur killer were to hit Earth in just the right place tomorrow only microscopic life would survive. That some underground facility or nuclear submarine with a band of courageous survivors might repopulate the Earth is a great science fiction story but not plausible if the surface and oceans were nearly sterilized. The best place to survive such an extinction event would be off-world.
A planet killer was, by the way, the plot of the movie “Armageddon”; from https://grantland.com/hollywood-prospectus/bragging-rights-armageddon/ “Over the years, the big-budget story of an asteroid on a collision course with Earth and the lovable oil-rig roughnecks tapped by NASA to do something about it has become its own shorthand. Armageddon means explosions, it means ’90s Hollywood, it means emotional manipulation — “That man’s not a salesman. That’s your daddy” — and it means that unholy union of Jerry Bruckheimer and Michael Bay. Armageddon makes people roll their eyes. “Movie isn’t actually the best word to describe ‘Armageddon,’” wrote Janet Maslin in the New York Times in 1998. “More accurately it’s a product, a feat of salesmanship.”
The movie “Deep Impact” was much better than, but unlike “Armageddon”, had the caveat humankind might survive the worst case. Besides a planet killing impact another worst case scenario is the engineered pathogen. I have argued on a few forums, before I was banned from them for being a critic of NewSpace, that a 100 percent lethal pathogen is one valid reason to establish Survival Colonies. There was always some rabid neoliberal Ayn-Rand-in-Space type who would reply some humans would always have some “natural resistance” to the pathogen so life would go on. Not true of course.
After a planet killer and engineered pathogen comes the possibility of a super-volcano epic coating the surface of the planet in ash, contaminating the atmosphere and poisoning the oceans, and freezing the surface of the planet by blocking sunlight. If the epic was intense enough it would have the same effect as the planet killer. Of the three I would say the engineered pathogen is the biggest danger. I listed it second only because an impact is far more likely to depopulate the planet and can be most easily guarded against. While a large impact might leave a small remnant alive it would make those few far more vulnerable to a secondary plague or other event ending us. As I have stated several times, any extra-terrestrials observing our extinction by way of an impact or volcanic epic would remark we were just too stupid to survive. Natural selection.
Unnatural selection by way of purposefully murdering each other with an engineered pathogen is, in my view, the biggest danger. A lesser impact or single super-volcano that destabilizes civilization and leads to nuclear war could end with a last ditch biological agent being released. Even a Carrington Solar Event could be the catalyst of extinction. Climate Change will doubtless have unintended consequences we cannot foresee now that could likewise set humankind up for a catastrophe leaving us vulnerable to a secondary event extinguishing our species. Our optimism bias conditions us to ignore such possibilities. We believe we will somehow be lucky enough to survive whatever comes our way. This could end us.
The views I have expressed on this blog over time have not changed much and the original concept of women in space as insurance for the human race has not changed at all. We know eggs are viable after being frozen for a quarter century and woman in their 70’s have given birth so it is not unreasonable to expect women tasked with restoring the human race might produce around ten more females each. The question is where these children would be born. If there are giant lava tubes under the Moon this could be the answer.
Graphic from Purdue University
A lava tube with an interior over 3000 feet in diameter would allow for a circular train generating artificial gravity to be constructed, what I call a “sleeper train.” Such trains, perhaps stacked on top of each other to utilize available space, might allow for a small population to survive and even thrive on the Moon. On icy bodies such as Ceres and the ocean moons of the gas and ice giants it might be even easier to effect these constructs. Such distant outposts are unlikely unless Survival Colonies under the Moon are in need of water or volatiles. It is possible that resources on the Moon could be limited in which case expanding outward would eventually be necessary for sustaining the lunar population.
If the Earth was to suddenly die, this kind of existence in small subsurface communities might be the only viable path since the massive resources we now enjoy to support building true space habitats would not be available. Slowly rebuilding the population by expanding these kinds of communities into the solar system until a workforce and resources were available for building habitats might take centuries. In the event of a catastrophe on Earth it would be far better to already have or be in the process of setting up lunar factories enabling miles-in-diameter-artificial-spinning-hollow-moons. Gerard K. O’Neill envisioned the Earth eventually becoming a place people went visit like a national park with almost the entire human race living in space.
From: Project Orion, the true story of the atomic spaceship, by George Dyson
Few people today could tell you what the “41 for Freedom” were. In the late 1950’s the DOD worried over the Soviet Union destroying the U.S. strategic deterrent of nuclear weapons in a “first strike.” Missiles in silos in the Midwest and the majority of the nuclear bomber fleet at airbases were considered vulnerable to being destroyed in a future preemptive launch by the adversary. The solution was a fleet of 41 nuclear submarines loaded with Polaris nuclear missiles. A force of these “boomers” was to be kept at sea and hidden in the depths of the ocean, immune to any first strike.
From wiki: “George Washington left Groton on 28 June 1960 for Cape Canaveral, Florida, where she loaded two Polaris missiles. Standing out into the Atlantic Missile Test Range – she successfully conducted the first Polaris missile launch from a submerged submarine on 20 July 1960.”
Missile Submarines went to sea shortly before I was born. Now, over 60 years later, I am an old man and have lived my whole life with the constant threat of nuclear weapons minutes away from being launched and incinerating millions of human beings. Mutually Assured Destruction (MAD) has kept the world at peace for over half a century, preventing any third world war from breaking out. The price paid for that peace has been an incredible amount of money. The cost of the cold war was mind boggling and trillions of dollars continue to be spent. Eisenhower famously spoke about what could be accomplished for the cost of various cold war toys. However, the worst feature of this peace has not been impoverishment, it has been “launch-on-warning”, which has put civilization at risk every minute of every day for an entire lifetime. The result of a full-scale nuclear exchange has been fairly well worked out: billions would die of starvation, possibly a majority of the human race, caused by, for starters, reduced crop yields from smoke in the atmosphere. The fragile structure of our worldwide distribution system would be wrecked and humanity would enter a new dark age.
A nuclear exchange would not be an extinction-level-event in itself, but it could lead to one in that another event, such as a plague, meteor/comet impact, or super-volcano epic might finish us off. And it goes without saying that a lesser version of any of those could trigger an exchange or destabilize relations and cause a global conflict. A Carrington event solar flare could also lead to a chain reaction resulting in nuclear war and the collapse of civilization. The point being we are in a position right now to direct immense resources at safeguarding civilization. It is no exaggeration to state that a century from now the human population of Earth could be in the process of migrating to space colonies. A century after that Starships carrying frozen humans could be beam-propelled on centuries-long voyages to other stars. These scenarios are what the human race needs to be focused on if we are to survive.
The first step is to begin a second space age using the same device that created the first one: the hydrogen bomb. The dream of removing nuclear weapons from planet Earth can be realized by the superpowers building fleets of Spaceships carrying the bombs months away into deep space. No more launch-on-warning. Not only will the risk of nuclear war ratchet down but a plan to insure humankind survives any natural catastrophes can be put in motion. The same repurposed atomic bombs used to push Spaceships through interplanetary space can be used to deflect asteroid and comet impact threats.
image at wikipedia; meteor impact
The first “Space Boomer” could be operational just outside of a decade, much like the first human missions to the Moon were accomplished in that time frame. The main requirements pose no real technical challenges. The trillion plus dollars presently earmarked for new stealth bombers, missile submarines, and generally refurbishing our deterrent can be redirected at space. The sequence would likely begin with a constantly evolving Super Heavy Lift Vehicle (SHLV) program of 6 to 8 launches per year. A basic cislunar infrastructure created for utilizing lunar water for crew compartment shielding would start the assembly pipeline. The first “true” Space Stations and Lunar Cyclers would follow leading to the first “true” Spaceship. This first “Space Boomer” would likely use a “soft” Nuclear Pulse Propulsion system based on the “Medusa” concept.
The “hard” Pulse system will come later. Whether such flying saucers can first be sent up in thin discs or “slices” and assembled and really big multi-thousand ton discs later manufactured on the Moon is yet to be determined. The first true Spaceships will likely be based on the concept detailed in the 1991 paper “New Ideas for Nuclear Explosive Spacecraft Propulsion” by Johndale C. Solem. Such a spaceship could be assembled and launched from a Earth polar orbit using the first iteration of the SLS and other launch vehicles but this would not be the most efficient way to proceed except as a demonstrator to show the concept is valid. Without a kiloton plus water shield it would not be a “true” Spaceship. Lifting that thousand tons of tap water into Earth orbit would by itself show why the ice on the Moon is the critical enabling resource.
Thus the name of this blog which I started five years ago.
I posted the following comments on YouTube concerning Joe’s video:
“A “space station” vs an orbital platform would have a cosmic ray water shield and artificial gravity, likely using a tether system to spin wet workshops. The thousand plus tons of water for shielding would also likely be ferried up from the lunar poles by robot landers. This is not what the gateway is and it is not “sustainable” because it won’t shield astronauts or provide artificial gravity.” And then-
“As for your “rationale” of using lunar orbital velocity what you don’t seem to get Joe is that chemical energy is NOT going to send humans anywhere Beyond Earth and Lunar Orbit (BELO). Only nuclear energy will work and there is only one practical nuclear propulsion system- Nuclear Pulse (bombs). Concerning Landers setting down on the Moon to acquire ice these likely robots would be semi-expendable vs reusable. “Reusable” by definition means being able to do maintenance on it between flights. The only place any kind of serious maintenance is going to be done off-world is under the Moon in a pressurized hangar. So, until we move into a lava tube or excavate some kind of base with a pressurized radiation sanctuary anything flying around the cislunar sea is going to just fly till it breaks. See how that works?” And I also posted a link to my October entry about Space Stations vs. Spaceships.
The Parker-Dyson-Spudis Continuum, which I have commented about for years on Dr. Spudis’ blog when he was alive and on other blogs when I was not banned, explains what I hope is the basic problem confronting humankind in regards to any Human Space Flight Beyond Earth and Lunar Orbit (HSF-BELO). That problem is of course that humans require a Near Sea Level Radiation one Gravity (NSLR1G) environment for any long duration deep space missions. According to Eugene Parker, the authority on space radiation, the heavy nuclei component of galactic cosmic radiation requires a massive shield to stop. Water is by far the most utilitarian substance for radiation shielding and can be lifted from the lunar poles with 22 times less energy than from Earth.
The shielding for any amount of interior space considered livable for multi-year missions would entail a water shield well over a thousand tons for a couple astronauts. From that follows the only propulsion system available for a long time to come that can push such a shield around the solar system at the speeds necessary for a two-way mission to the outer planets which is Nuclear Pulse (bombs). Although this concept originated with Stanislaw Ulam the Original work was done by Freeman Dyson. Last is where to acquire the water shielding, assemble, test and launch such nuclear missions: the vicinity of, or on, the Moon. This was made clear by the work of lunar geologist Paul Spudis.
There are several pieces of critical hardware required for efficiently expanding the human presence into cislunar space and beyond. The first is the Super Heavy Lift Vehicle (SHLV). The SLS is the only such vehicle being offered in my view as the shiny starship is…just another NewSpace gimmick I expect to fail miserably. What the SLS needs to succeed is first a cadence of 6 to 8 flights per year minimum. This could be effected by abandoning Low Earth Orbit (LEO) and redirecting funding into building a second and third SLS core stage production line. All it takes is money. The ISS is a 4 billion dollar a year dead end.
The SHLV 6 to 8 flights a year is a prerequisite- it has to happen for anything else to. Along with the basic way to get there, there is the question of what to send to the vicinity of the Moon and the answer is the building block of a cislunar infrastructure: the wet workshop. Not just a repurposed upper stage but one designed with a double hull utilizing the outer envelope to contain a cosmic ray water shield. This construct would be a “Fat Workshop” of 50 to 60 foot diameter. Sending these Fat Workshops to the Moon with a semi-expendable Robot Lander on top will likely require a 150 ton payload capability.
In my view the best way to enable the necessary 150 ton payload would be to call upon NewSpace to provide replacements for the SLS 5 segment boosters. I propose two lower stages of the New Glenn and a stretched core stage could launch a 60 foot diameter Fat Workshop with a Robot Lander on top to the Moon.
Sending those Workshop/Lander payloads to the Moon six times a year would be the way to begin. There might also be enough spare payload to allow the SLS RS-25 engine section to reenter with a heat shield as a module and land back for resuse (expending the tank structure). This would essentially be what the Space Shuttle could have been- a way to economically place crew compartments and Landers in the vicinity of the Moon by expending only a large second stage (or core stage) fuel structure.
The semi-expendable Robot Landers would be able to dock with Fat Workshops and move them around and several of the Landers might join together into a composite booster to power Lunar Cyclers. The Cyclers are also on the list of necessary hardware as they would provide radiation shielded transit for astronauts to and from the Moon. This growing list of expensive hardware; triple production lines for stretched SLS core stages, New Glenn 1st stages as replacements for SLS SRB’s, Fat Workshops and Robot Landers, RS-25 re-entry/landing modules, and a fleet of Lunar Cyclers, all this might seem impossible except for the one enabling resource- the DOD.
And I think I am going to describe exactly how to get the DOD to pay for all this next with a separate blog entry. It will start with…Submarines.
“This mission would answer a fundamental question: Are there asteroids or comets out there that can cause harm to the Earth over the next century?”
I can answer that question right now. Yes.
The first space age lasted four years and was essentially a cold war battle won by landing on the Moon. The next space age has the potential to once again be about the superpowers and nuclear weapons. The problem is humankind does not seem intelligent enough to make it happen. This could be a showstopper…as in stopping our species dead in its tracks with an extinction level event. The trick is to place thousands of nuclear weapons months away in space on fleets of spaceships and thus remove the hair-trigger-launch-on-warning situation from Earth.
And also defend Earth from comet and asteroid impacts.
And also explore the ocean moons of the gas and ice giants (and Ceres).
And also kick-start the Space Solar Power industry (and space colonization).
Maybe Amy Mainzer could make it happen. If she were to write an Einstein-type letter to the DNC: https://democrats.org/who-we-are/about-the-democratic-party/ recommending the Green New Deal might be best realized as a program to remove all nuclear weapons from Earth and place them in deep space on human-crewed spaceships.
In conclusion, I have written in the past about beam propulsion enabling mass migration to space habitats and I found this recent article worth editing in:
-Allison Jaynes, a space physicist at the University of Iowa states, “Besides safeguarding against a nuclear burst, RBR technology could have a civilian dividend, Jaynes notes. NASA and other space agencies have long wrestled with shielding astronauts from the Van Allen belts and other sources of radiation on their way to and from deep space. VLF transmitters might be used to clear out high-energy electrons just before a spacecraft enters a danger zone. “When we become more active space travelers,” she says, “it could provide a safe passage through the radiation belts.”
The “dramatic error in American spaceflight” is just one more on the list.
The first mistake was not making Project Orion and Nuclear Pulse Propulsion part of the NASA charter in 1958. It must have been obvious even then that lighting off hundreds of bombs in the atmosphere was not practical due to radioactive contamination and the system would likely have to be used well away from Earth orbit. To launch “slices” of the disc used in a pulse propulsion system would require a Nova Class rocket. In 1991 a new approach to Pulse was proposed, the “Medusa” concept, which would make a less efficient Pulse system immediately available.
The second mistake was not pursuing reusability from the beginning. Philip Bono was the pioneering engineer of the early 1960’s who advocated for Vertical Take-off Vertical Landing (VTVL). This might seem a case of hindsight but in fact VTVL was a recurring theme in science fiction movies and even seen on television shows in the 1950’s such as “Rocky Jones Space Ranger” in early 1954 (1:50). An interesting feature is the obvious massive electrical grid required to launch the “XV2.” A coincidence in regards to the much later concept of beam propulsion. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=T8Hf-9wHA0I
The third mistake was the limited goal of the Apollo program, to land humans on the Moon and return them, instead of establishing a permanent presence. If that goal had been set as a Moonbase, Apollo would likely have continued to the present day with a constantly evolving family of launch vehicles. The space race was a consequence of the cold war and it is ironic the salient feature of that conflict, the atomic bomb, remains the only enabler for interplanetary travel by humans. Treaties limiting the testing and deployment of nuclear devices crippled any possibility of humans exploring the solar system in the 20th century.
Americans love to glorify NASA and though the amazing work of that agency is now incessantly trivialized and demeaned by NewSpace proponents, the goals set leading up to the first space age were in reality quite limited. Neoliberal contamination was canceling out imbedded liberalism and post war Keynesian economics and this ultimately doomed the first space age to lasting only four short years. The Apollo 1 fire made it clear to aerospace concerns that Human Space Flight Beyond Earth Orbit (HSF-BEO) was going to be hard money and they opted for the easy money of cold war toys.
In the mid 50’s and early 60’s it seemed obvious that nuclear energy would be required for Human Space Flight Beyond Earth and Lunar Orbit (HSF-BELO). While chemical energy was appropriate for use in the Earth’s atmosphere and magnetosphere and would serve to enable a cislunar infrastructure, nuclear energy would be required for any human exploration beyond the cislunar sea. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8vblN33OJCg
Stuhlinger and von Braun from wiki
The 500 foot diameter heat exchanger required for the nuclear electric spaceship concept was interesting in that a similar size solid alloy disc of much greater mass would replace it as the engine of the future. Nuclear Electric and the simpler Nuclear Thermal Rocket (NTR) would both soon be rendered obsolete by the work of Freeman Dyson validating Nuclear Pulse Propulsion. Using what are essentially repurposed nuclear weapons, Pulse still remains the only practical path to a human-crewed true spaceship capable of multi-year voyages of exploration to the outer system.
The test ban treaty of 1963 and outer space treaty of 1967 effectively removed nuclear energy for space propulsion from the zietgeist for over half a century up to the present day. The key technologies regarding nuclear space propulsion were human-rating a Super Heavy Lift Vehicle (SHLV) with a solid fuel escape tower, which allowed fissile materials to be sent into space at acceptable risk, as proven by Apollo. In the 1970’s, as the end of the first space age loomed, a second series of wrong turns were made by the space agency.
In 1971 the Air Force and NASA determined the basic design of the Space Shuttle and a year later Nixon signed off on the program. A decade earlier Philip Bono had advocated for VTVL development but the Shuttle departed from simply landing back stages in the same way they had launched and went with a whole range of very bad design features that would guarantee failure. The catalogue of defects was known and publicized but the show had to go on. http://www.iasa-intl.com/folders/shuttle/GoodbyeColumbia.html
Besides a flawed design the Shuttle’s very purpose was a mistake. Low Earth Orbit (LEO) had been left far behind in 1968 with Apollo 8 and did not really qualify as space exploration or even “space” after that mission. Retreating to a couple hundred miles up after traveling a quarter million miles was a several-orders-of-magnitude-defeat. Sadly, the Space Shuttle had been sold to the public as a space truck that would “pay for itself” when it would ultimately cost close to the same as the Saturn V per launch. This kind of wasted effort was repeated with ISS, the first component being launched in 1998 and eventually costing 180 billion dollars to complete. Again, sadly, a fully funded Skylab, launched in 1973, would have gone up as a wet instead of dry workshop and been larger than the ISS in a single Saturn V launch.
It is interesting that the main reason used to justify the incredibly expensive ISS, microgravity research, could have been accomplished by the Space Shuttle using Extended Duration Orbiter (EDO) pallets. These pallets could have been sent up and allowed a shuttle to stay in space for the six month tours the ISS provides. The main problem was a pilot and copilot to eventually land the Shuttle since debilitation would require a new flight crew. A second shuttle launch could have ferried a pilot and copilot up or various other schemes tried. The Shuttle could also have been landed by autopilot but this feature had been omitted from the design on purpose. The space station to nowhere was and is the most expensive boondoggle in history.
4. Retreating to LEO with the Space Shuttle was the 4th cardinal error made by the space agency. The Moon or at least the vicinity of the Moon should have been kept inviolate as the focus of Human Space Flight. Skylab might have been a path to realizing a continuing lunar presence without a Moonbase by first launching the full wet workshop version into LEO and then launching a booster capable of inserting the platform into a lunar orbit. Of course there would have been problems with this due to Lunar orbits being unstable and the need for massive radiation shielding. However, this would have led to the present solutions to those problems. “Frozen Lunar Orbits” and lunar ice being ferried up by robot landers and utilized as cosmic ray shielding are the most likely enablers of lunar platforms, space stations, and a fleet of Lunar Cyclers.
5. Number five on the list of wrong turns was of course the design of the Space Shuttle itself, which wasted most of the lift of a Saturn V class vehicle sending a 737-size glider into low orbit so it could come right back down. A huge cargo bay when there was nothing to bring back down. An extremely maintenance intensive heat shield and “reusable” boosters that were not powerful enough and had to be disassembled and railed to and from Utah after each use. And…no escape system. Note the image at the top of the page of Nixon and a Space Shuttle model features a Shuttle concept using a single 260 inch SRB and a pair of expendable external tanks. This would likely have prevented the Challenger Disaster and using heat resistant alloys and a smaller wing would have prevented the loss of the Columbia. The inferior segmented SRB’s from Utah may have been politically expedient but they were inferior to the Aerojet monolithic design.
6. A most egregious waste of tax dollars, as stated previously, was the 180 billion dollar space station to nowhere. That funding could have been directed toward a “Shuttle C” which would have done away with the Orbiter and had the main engine module come back alone and in some concepts vertically land. It would have followed to develop the liquid boosters originally specified and the result would have had much the same performance as the Saturn V first and second stage. A cargo version of the Shuttle was pursued near the end of the program with the Sidemount proposal which the Augustine Commission, heavily biased toward NewSpace, wanted nothing to do with. Like the Saturn V, U.S. heavy lift capability was again thrown away in favor of a something-for-nothing-scam. The Space Launch System (SLS) was born out of the ashes and immediately demonized by NewSpace promoters for the obvious reason that it competed with their flagship company for tax dollars. The 4 billion dollars a year spent on going in circles a couple hundred miles up in the ISS should be redirected into a second and third SLS core production line.
7. The most serious and devastating mistake of all was adopting NewSpace. The overriding purpose of Human Space Flight (HSF) is the survival imperative- to guarantee humankind will not be rendered extinct by any natural or human-caused events. In the 1970’s Gerard K. O’Neill, the prophet of space colonization, envisioned miles-in-diameter hollow artificial moons manufactured from lunar resources as the next step for humankind. O’Neill foresaw Space Solar Energy as the economic engine driving colonization and also a cure for global warming. Instead of colonization we have NewSpace. Tens of thousands of pieces of space junk and shiny starships to Mars for the rich is the plan. The ruinous effects of this pernicious ideology have yet to be realized.
The 75 ton lift of Shuttle C could have enabled “Medusa Missions” to the outer solar system. Concerning the politics involved, Solem writes:
“We are currently prohibited by treaty from: (1) deploying weapons of mass destruction
in space and (2) testing nuclear weapons in space. MEDUSA violates neither the letter
nor the spirit of either prohibition, but it does use nuclear explosives. The radioactive
debris from MEDUSA’s exhaust is so finely dispersed that it will be nearly undetectable.
I assert that MEDUSA’S net environmental impact is less than NERVA; you have to do
something with the spent reactor. I see no reason why nuclear explosive propulsion for
interplanetary missions cannot be made politically acceptable. Perhaps we can be more
creative and consider an international mission in which the nuclear explosives were jointly supplied by the superpowers. What a wonderful approach to nuclear disarmament and the enhancement of science for the benefit of all humanity!”
Ceres would have been a likely first destination for a Medusa ship. What could have been. George Santayana is often misquoted in that usually only the last part of his most famous saying is stated: “Progress, far from consisting in change, depends on retentiveness. When change is absolute there remains no being to improve and no direction is set for possible improvement: and when experience is not retained, as among savages, infancy is perpetual. Those who cannot remember the past are condemned to repeat it.”
To retain what has been learned, to see the direction that would have improved our being, that is what saves us from condemnation. Like Santayana’s perpetual infant we are not remembering. Right now we have the resources to effectively expand humankind into the solar system and guarantee our survival. That may not last.
According to this article my search for meaning was important to me in my 20’s and is now at it’s lowest point while my sense that life has meaning was low then and is now at it’s highest. Statistically across a number of individuals. Of course I have to be the unhappy exception. I suspect a study of terror management theory is what is skewing my numbers. The following schematic is not from the article, it is from: https://www.ecologyandsociety.org/vol22/iss3/art32/figure1.html
From the article: “It’s not clear whether health and well-being make people feel life is meaningful, or whether people who find meaning in life become healthier. “I suspect that the relationship goes both ways,” Aftab said. “How healthy and functional we are impacts how meaningful we find our lives to be, and that meaning in our lives in turn promotes further health and well-being.”
In my view the key to understanding meaning and my own mortality at this late point in life is my three year old Granddaughter. Across a spectrum of “proximal (conscious, near, and threat-focused) and distal (unconscious, distant, symbolic) defenses” my Granddaughter is the opposite of a threat and in no way unconscious. My death anxiety has more to do with reality than all the stuff we fill up our three pound universe with. I am a simple machine.
When my Father was dying, during a particularly stressful episode when I was very tired, I hallucinated columns of glowing rectangles on the wall. Somewhat like the graphic above. I suspect it had to do with the many years I spent troubleshooting autopilot systems using flow charts. Those rescue helicopters were the most meaningful work of my life. Perhaps I was trying to figure out what was happening and looking for a solution. The solution I was involved in was the endura my Father was going through. I was searching for some kind of consolamentum for him.
Everyone has events burned into their memory- experiences they attach meaning to. In terms of affecting my worldview two stand out. It was only decades later that the first would become important to me but the second had an immediate effect. The first was the Challenger disaster in 1986 and the second was when they took the B-52’s off alert in 1991. I was 26 years old and 31 years old when those events took place. Sadly, I don’t remember much about those 5 years between. Both events connect across generations to my Father and my Granddaughter.
In 1986 I had just began my years in Coast Guard Aviation at an Air Station in the deep south. With my wife and baby daughter in our little apartment I was, at the time of the Challenger disaster, learning how to fuel aircraft as all new mechanics did. I remember that cold morning. Five years later my little girl was in elementary school and the cold war, which had shaped my life in so many ways, was coming to an end. I was checking on the status of a Search And Rescue case in the ops center and I stopped to watch Bush senior on the news talking about taking the bombers off alert. A decade later I watched another historic newscast a few days after my forty first birthday. The end of the cold war had a far stronger effect on me than 911. We had all expected Armageddon. A terrorist attack, even one that killed thousands, was just not that big of a deal.
My Father worked on jet fighters most of his career in the Navy and was at sea for most of my childhood. We never formed any kind of bond. The war with no real battles that everyone feared would be the end of the world was the reason I had no Father. The bright future the space shuttle program promised ended as I was trying to do the exact opposite of what my Father had done. I was in the one military service trying not to fight a war and instead trying to save lives. And going home to my wife and daughter every night instead of leaving them alone for months at a time. I tried to be better than him but never could. I had serious problems with the military culture and was lucky to retire.
My Granddaughter makes all that drama fairly meaningless. All the bitter regrets and unhappiness with society are fading as she grows. When I hear her voice and see her bright eyes nothing else matters except her. The past does not matter; I don’t matter. I was not a big space fan at the time of the Shuttle disaster but these many years later I now finally understand that space is how to save this world for our children. Gerard K. O’Neill was the prophet of space colonization, with the plan humankind needed to survive it’s own sins. Seven months after the B-52’s were taken off alert in 1991 O’Neill died. I did not know about his death and it would not have had much meaning for me then. Now, 28 years later, his vision is even more important as the only likely cure for climate change.
My own death, predicted by averaging the lifespans of my Mother and Father, is less than two decades away. It seems a distant end but looking in the mirror and seeing the rapid advance of aging shows how quickly my story is being read. I remember Dr. Spudis wrote an article on geologic time around a year before his death and he probably had been diagnosed as terminal and was contemplating his life. It is interesting that while my own mortality is deeply distressing, when I think of my Wife and Daughter and Granddaughter that is what is most profoundly frustrating, depressing, and sad. As I explained to my little girl once, men are by nature expendable. It is women that matter.
Geekwire photo- Alan Boyle
Stuhlinger and von Braun from wiki
Ice on the Moon 