One Year Ago and now Kamala

How did we get here? The dumbing of America, from Reagan to Trump and beyond

by Brian Karem writing for Salon

How screwed are we? I’ll tell you.

On Wednesday, the news was all about a big bag of wind destroying Florida and flooding the South, spreading destruction and threatening pestilence and death.

Then there’s Hurricane Idalia.

Also on Wednesday, Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell froze and stood motionless in front of an assembly of reporters — for the second time this summer — so that’s encouraging.

But seriously, folks. Last Thursday, Donald Trump turned a 22-minute booking for a felony indictment in Georgia into a six-hour media special, complete with a larger motorcade than the actual president’s — with dozens of camera lights on the runway and a chopper-talk session.

Meanwhile, Joe Biden, the aforementioned actual president, quietly lent assistance to Hawaii after the devastating wildfires on Maui, for which he was criticized by Republican members of Congress. He also met with international leaders at the White House this week, and went after Big Pharma to negotiate reduced Medicare prices for 10 common prescription drugs.

The press? Well, we completely missed the point, as usual, and covered every juvenile tantrum Donald Trump threw in his malevolent attempt to stay in the news. The context is missing. The press is failing us, and people are too ignorant to notice the problem. That’s because we’re busy dividing ourselves into teams of social cheerleaders, cheering on our champions and literally booing the opposition.

Welcome to politics 2023. One man, who claims to support Christian values, continues his run for the highest office in the land based on revenge and hypocrisy, while our president, a devout Catholic, is insulted by the likes of Ted Cruz, accused of being anti-Catholic and “the face of corruption” in a post on X (formerly Twitter). Biden, in case anyone cares, goes to church every Sunday. Trump never went once in his four years at the White House. Rumor was it would burst into flames if he did.

It would be easy to claim that all of this is new. But that would also be wrong. The seeds of today’s political division and reporting began with Ronald Reagan.

While lying to the press, Reagan also set out to destroy it. He himself was quoted in the New York Times on Oct. 6, 1985, saying, “A substantial part of the political thing is acting and role playing and I know how to do that.”

Of course that’s literally all it is today.

What else is different?

Well, the press itself is different too. Reagan destroyed the FCC’s “fairness doctrine” and encouraged media consolidation. Decades later, as social media rose to take the place of the corporate media’s diminished role in providing vetted information, the slide accelerated.

People hiding behind anonymous handles rather than their actual names hurled insults and threats. Twitter offered “verified” names as a way to combat that — until Elon Musk took over and turned the verification process upside down, once again making anonymous insults and trolls fashionable.

Every tool used to legitimize and verify information in the last 40 years has evaporated under the push to make money. Fewer companies own most of the corporate media. Fewer independent news platforms exist — and they often get lumped in with bloggers and trolls.

The end result is chaos. Confusion.

That’s how America became stupid. Neil deGrasse Tyson, while trying to address how the U.S. is being left behind in areas such as physics, math and engineering (not to mention infrastructure) observed in a recent speech that “Science illiteracy is rampant in our culture.” When he addressed the problems of journalism, he pointed out a headline that read, “80 percent of airplane crash survivors had studied the locations of the exit doors on takeoff.”

As Tyson noted, there are quite a few things wrong with that headline, including this: Did they manage to interview those people who didn’t survive plane crashes? Another headline reported that half the schools in a certain district were “below average.” No kidding: That’s what “average” means. (OK, technically that would be the definition of ‘median,” but to insist on nuance now is pointless.)

Our inherent, vapid stupidity in the news business makes us sound more like characters in the 1970s novelty song”The Streak” than the diligent investigative reporters played by Dustin Hoffman and Robert Redford in “All the President’s Men.”

That’s right. We’re just as proud as we can be of our anatomy and we’re inviting public critique.

Too arcane? Try it this way: We don’t get it.

Donald Trump faces 91 felony charges in four different jurisdictions, brought by approximately 100 American citizens sitting on four different grand juries. This major play by the justice system is the last bid for accountability that I’ll see in my lifetime for Donald Trump, and by extension for those who hold power and are willing to break the law in order to keep it. If it fails, then, quite literally, God help us. There will be no holding the rich and the powerful accountable — for anything, ever.

Meanwhile, Trump himself is desperate. He smells of it as surely as a “Supernatural” demon smells of sulfur. Yet we continue to give him a thin veneer of credibility by allowing him to claim that a legitimate prosecution is political persecution.

Who cares what Donald Trump thinks?

When Charles Manson went on trial for orchestrating a series of gruesome murders, we did not dance on the head of a pin for his demons. Is Trump a lesser demon? No. If anything, he’s worse. His criminal activity has caused the suffering of millions, if not billions, across the planet and the fallout has only just begun.

We give his illegitimate political spawn, like Vivek Ramaswamy and Marjorie Taylor Greene, ample opportunity to propose bombing our allies for supplying drugs that millions of our citizens demand, while claiming climate change is a hoax. These minor demons are drafting off Trump while creating whole new lanes of lunacy.

In the corporate media, we keep fighting over competing inaccurate narratives while members of Congress contribute to the mayhem by “playing a role,” as Ronald Reagan put it 40 years ago.

Want a daily wrap-up of all the news and commentary Salon has to offer? Subscribe to our morning newsletter, Crash Course.

The stupidity of the press is actually harder to decipher than the pandering of our politicians to constituents whom they view as fans of their fictional personas. Most of us are vaguely aware of the danger posed by Donald Trump. Some of us are acutely aware of it. But we’re also insecure and ignorant and not sure how to write or speak about him. If we simply call him a liar and a charlatan, we risk being called partisan. If we don’t show respect for “both sides,” then we are sullying our reputation — unless of course we are overtly partisan, and in that case we don’t care.

Either way, we flail about because of our inexperience. Everyone — even corporate news managers — say they wish we had more Walter Cronkites than Tucker Carlsons in the profession. You know, people with experience and common sense, rather than clowns chasing shadows.

The very same managers who wistfully wish for the “good old days” do not hire or promote people like Walter Cronkite, particularly not in television. The grizzled beat reporter with vast experience has been replaced by smiling, blissfully ignorant and much cheaper talking heads who can either entice or enrage an audience with their good looks while sounding knowledgeable. They definitely aren’t. We too have chased the Reagan model, and cover politics the same way politicians conduct their business: flash over substance.

You don’t have to look at political reporters. Just look at how we cover natural disasters, like the hurricane in Florida. How many times have you heard a reporter tell an anchor during a live shot, “Great question!” That’s usually a self-congratulatory comment, since the reporter has likely scripted the question for the anchor. The routine descriptions of all hurricanes, since I began covering them in the 1980s, includes cliché phrases like, “Never seen anything like this before” and “unparalleled destruction,” while the reporters wade through flood waters trying to look brave.

Please. TV reporters have covered hurricanes and major weather events the same way since Dan Rather waded into the flood waters while covering Hurricane Carla for KHOU in 1961. His stunt reporting eventually led to him replacing Cronkite as the anchor of “CBS Evening News.” Rather is revered today, but his contemporary peers often did not see him that way. He was a product of television, seen as a performer in his earlier years. He grew into his role and earned his stripes, but he was also the anchor who critics argue ushered in the new era of flash over substance. The fact that he’s so respected today speaks not only to his growth as a reporter, but perhaps also to our lowered expectations of reporters.

But please: It’s all about the Barbie movie! Or the horse race of politics, or the polls.

We can report on numbers and fictional characters. They are simple and clean. People are not. Covering people takes a lot of experience, an ability to understand nuances of speech, actions and culture. We have none of that today — either among the press or among politicians.

Former House Speaker Tip O’Neill said of Reagan that “he knows less than any president I’ve ever known.” The joke that circulated around D.C. during his presidency was that Reagan had tried to defect to the Soviet Union but was sent back because “he didn’t know anything.” As a performer playing Reagan in the off-Broadway show “Rap Master Ronnie” put it, “If you’re right 90 percent of the time, why quibble over the remaining three percent?”

John Wayne, a notorious conservative and longtime ally of Reagan’s, wrote him a blistering letter in 1977 telling Reagan to stop misinforming people about the Panama Canal treaty. “I’ll show you point by God damn point in the treaty where you are misinforming people. This is not my point of view against your point of view. These are facts,” Wayne wrote.

Reagan didn’t care. He played to the crowd he helped create, which has proliferated since he won the presidency in 1980. “You’d be surprised how much being a good actor pays off,” he told the Washington Post in 1984.

Now you understand how Donald Trump and his minions can spout limitless hypocrisy and get away with it. And you understand how the press, which was once able to accurately point out the lies and hypocrisy, today cannot.

“Floating down the stream of time,” George Harrison once told us “makes no difference where you are or where you’d like to be.”

Yes. It is all too much.

We are led by aging and frail men and women who should step aside, or by grifters who con their constituents because they don’t know or don’t care about anything better.

And all of this is being reported by indifferent, insecure, ignorant and incompetent journalists whose only goal is to fill time, gain ratings and pretend they know what they’re doing.

That’s how screwed we are.

The only consolation is that if the Justice Department remains sound, then Donald Trump will likely spend his remaining years behind bars, staring at himself in the mirror with no access to the outside world.

Sowing Chaos

It is clear what their plan is; wreck the certification process and have congress and/or the supreme court place Trump in power.

“Organized conspiracy”: Experts warn Trump allies on Georgia election board are “sowing chaos”
Story by Marina Villeneuve

Allies of former President Donald Trump on the Georgia state election board are stirring up chaos by passing new mandates ahead of the November election in a bid to dissuade voters and overwhelm local election officials, election experts warn.

The Georgia elections board passed a handful of rule changes this month that election officials across the state have decried as unnecessary and burdensome.
One rule, passed by a 3-2 partisan line vote Aug. 19, would allow county election board members to delay the certification of votes by investigating discrepancies between ballots cast and the number of voters.

The board the same day also advanced a rule requiring those ballots to be counted by hand.
And earlier in August, the board adopted a rule to allow local election boards to conduct a “reasonable inquiry” of election results – without defining what exactly that means.

The Georgia Association of Voter Registration and Election Officials, which represents over 500 officials across the estate, asked the board to stop making sweeping rule changes in the weeks leading to the election.

Cathy Woolard, former Chair of the Fulton County Board of Registrations & Elections, said normally, the association itself would have come to the board to ask for particular changes – well ahead of an election cycle.
“That has not happened in any of these rule petitions,” she said on a call with reporters this week organized by advocacy group Fair Fight Action. “They have come from citizens who, generally speaking, have been, I hate to say it, but election deniers and activists who have kind of continued to stir the pot and have dialogue that there’s something wrong with our elections.

She continued: “This is 159 counties, election administrators and people who do the work day in, day out. When they come back and say: ‘You know, we don’t need this. This doesn’t clarify something. This is going to be a problem for us, just in terms of the logistics.’ And then they run roughshod over that and vote and with a partisan split. You have a problem there.”

Patrise Perkins-Hooker, the former chair of the Fulton County Board of Registration and Elections, said the changes are driven solely by partisanship – in favor of Trump. “As they become more politicized, they have become a political weapon of parties, a preference to undo the confidence in the election system, to raise doubt about the election system so they become much more politicized in their approach, and these rule making things are just evidence of it,” Perkins-Hooker said on the call with reporters.

Perkins-Hooker, a county attorney for Fulton County, pointed out that research shows voter fraud is rare and that Georgia in particular has a solid reputation for handling elections.

“if there is nothing, if there’s no problem, and we’ve had courts say there’s no problem in the conduct of elections in Georgia, why do you need all of these rules?” she said.

She said political and outside influence is driving election board decisions – not what’s in the best interest of Georgians.

“What has happened with the SEB is it has been populated by public comment from people who will believe our election system is flawed, and they want to curtail the free access of voters to elect their candidates,” she said.
The Trump allies on the Georgia Election Board are focusing on a little-known part of the voting process: certification.

Local election officials are tasked with certifying election results as a ministerial duty under statute.

Certification doesn’t happen until local election officials have repeatedly verified the results during the canvas and audit process — which includes everything from cross-checking ballots and tallies against voter lists to verifying signatures on mail-in ballots. States can address suspected errors and fraud with mechanisms from recounts, to audits, to evidentiary hearings before state election boards.

State laws make it clear that election officials have no discretion to refuse to certify election results,

Legal experts have told Salon that they expect courts will reject any efforts by local officials to question election results and delay certification.

Those experts say they’re more concerned about the role of state legislatures and the Trump-friendly Supreme Court coming to Trump’s aid as he sows the kind of discord and doubt in the nation’s electoral processes that preceded the violence in the U.S. Capitol on Jan. 6, 2021.

Woolard said it’s likely that Trump allies who try to delay certification will end up outvoted by other local board members.

“You may have counties where there’s a lot of attention right now, like Fulton County, where they most likely will be outvoted, because we understand what certification is,” she said. “But then you have other counties, where we might not be focused, perhaps maybe a county like Coffee County, where they might actually not certify the election.”

Still, she’s concerned about counties that might not certify and the confusion and disorder that could be unleashed.

“It gets back to that sowing chaos problem that you know that’s happening to this day, quite frankly,” she said.

Woolard said when she was previously director of the Fulton County board, the two Republicans and three Democrats on the board almost always ruled unanimously.

“We identified things that we needed to look into, and including things that were brought from my Republican colleagues, but we still came to a measured conclusion,” she said. “Now we have the same partisan split, but we have two people who aren’t voting for certification, who are entertaining notions of things that are being brought from other counties, from the Republican Party, from groups that don’t have anything to do with what is before us in terms of administering an election.”

ProPublica revealed that election deniers, through the rightwing Election Integrity Network, have secretly pushed a rule adopted by the state election board to make it easier to delay certification.

Woolard said she and other election officials are highly concerned about how the rule changes could throw election preparations into disarray.

“Getting ready to run an election like in Fulton County, we have 1000 volunteers, 250 Election Day precincts,” Wollard said. “Our traffic is a nightmare, and we’re having the same deadlines and time concerns in smaller counties that you know might have 1000 voters. We have 800,000 voters. It becomes very challenging to get about the work of running those elections when you’re constantly having this barrage of craziness that has nothing to do with what is before you as set out by law.”

She said our society often considers such logistical concerns will just get worked out at the end of the day.

“That’s sort of a concern that we don’t pay a lot of attention to, because you just assume it’s all going to go right,” she said. “But you know, what we do logistically is amazing, and it’s set up by state law. We follow it to the letter, even when it’s challenging. But then you throw all this other stuff on top of it that our staff has to deal with, and you really run the risk that you’re creating the potential for a failure that you know could have been avoided if people had time to actually do their work.”

Fair Fight Action CEO Lauren Groh-Wargo said even if votes end up certified at the end of the day, election deniers allied with Trump may achieve their overriding goal of stowing disinformation and distrust in the voting system.

“Their disinformation is already disenfranchising American citizens by getting it into law,” she said.

She pointed out that Trump allies are trying to invalidate categories of ballots, including provisional, out-of-precinct ballots.

“That is a successful strategy,” she said. “That is successfully disenfranchising voters. Number one, we have to take it seriously from that way, because it’s moving into statute.”

Groh-Wargo said the U.S. has seen more voter suppression, anti-voting bills passed in this country’s history in 2021 and 2023 than any time before.

She said the Trump effort in 2020 to pressure local officials to switch votes to him was alarming and noted that while some members of the Trump “voter suppression architecture” have ended up pleading guilty, the system moves slowly, and voters must understand both their rights and how local election officials have worked for years to develop a trustworthy system.

“Having gone through what we all went through four years ago, we take it seriously and know the power that these disinformation narratives have, and are ready for them to try to execute on all of this at a higher level,” she said. “Because the big difference from four years ago is that the MAGA, anti-voting election deniers, they have moved their way into so many local boards and state, state election boards all over the country. And so we know there’s an organized conspiracy, but we also know there are all those rogue actors.”

Wrecking the Election Process

Their plan is now clear and very little is being done to stop them except to…talk about it on the news. What is going to happen? They will wreck the election and then it will go to congress and/or the supreme court and it is very possible Trump will be President.

Chaos is their plan and on top of it they will absolutely call out the MAGA AR-15 army to shoot people in the streets and thus terrify everyone into just letting Trump walk back into the White House. It is crazy. It is happening.

Musk and Trump

The ticket to get into the MAGA club is to endorse the big lie. Trumpists know it is a lie, but the Orwellian transformation of their brains come with that lie being the truth of his “greater good.” That conspiracy is the communion wafer of MAGA. It transmutes in the mouth into holiness.

The same kind of pass is required for the Musk Cult. He is a malignant narcissist with the obvious goal of taking over the internet and making himself the god-emperor of cyberspace, and in his weird brain the ruler of the universe. Mars is his big lie and communion wafer of his cult. It was inevitable that Elon would end up in MAGA. Many of the worst people I have ever interacted with on forums have dual-membership.

Understanding Trump

To understand Trump, read the journalist who saw Hitler coming
Story by Braulio García Jaén


The Austrian journalist, playwright, poet and satirist, Karl Kraus, published 922 issues of a magazine called Die Fackel, or The Torch, most of them produced by him alone, convinced that a misplaced comma conceals the catastrophe of an era that consents to it.

Over the course of the past 100 years, his underground influence has been far more important than recognized in the cultural arena. In fact, it is reflected in works from his Nobel Prize-winning compatriot Elfriede Jelinek to the last poet to win the Cervantes Prize, the Venezuelan, Rafael Cadenas. Now, 150 years after his birth and 125 years after he started his magazine, his thinking continues to be relevant. If the editor of The New Yorker, David Remnick, recently recalled that “The New York Times overlooked the Holocaust,” it is worth remembering that Kraus saw it coming via the newspapers circulating in Vienna 10 years earlier, including foreign ones.

The influence of Kraus and The Torch was acknowledged openly a century ago by Ludwig Wittgenstein, Sigmund Freud, Theodor Adorno, Elias Canetti and Walter Benjamin. Between 1899 and 1936, Kraus dissected some of the contemporary evils in The Torch “simply by opening the newspaper,” as the political scientist Eric Voegelin pointed out in Hitler and the Germans. Three years before Kraus’ death, in The Third Walpurgis Night, which he wrote just after National Socialism came to power in Germany in 1933, “he accurately described and revealed [the] true nature [of Nazism].” He was “the first great critic of propaganda, anticipating Orwell’s vision of a totalitarian society dominated by doublethink and newspeak,” as his biographer Edward Timms wrote in Karl Kraus Apocalyptic Satirist: Culture and Catastrophe in Hapsburg Vienna.

Language was the main occupation of Kraus; his main concern was life, and he perceived the degradation of life in the degradation of language. This intimate and tragic relationship, and his unwavering commitment to fight it, makes his analysis of Nazi propaganda not only “a must-read for every student of political science,” according to Voegelin, but for all of us. Perhaps that is why a new edition was published in the U.S. at the end of Trump’s first term. Four years later, and with the prospect of a second Trump term looming, Kraus’ voice should still be ringing in our ears.

Early this summer, Madrid’s cultural center, La Casa Encendida, included Kraus in one of its programs. The far right had not yet had their victories in the European elections, but Trump’s return to the White House was looking increasingly viable. “It’s impossible not to remember Kraus regarding current affairs, where responsibility for the public word has completely lost its value. We began to see it very clearly in the elections that Trump won in 2016, where cynicism and lies were validated as political tools,” Sandra Santana, professor of Aesthetics at the University of La Laguna in Tenerife, tells EL PAÍS.

“When words deviate from their meaning,” explains Santana in a reference essay on Kraus, titled El laberinto de la palabra or The Labyrinth of the Word, “imposture begins to reign.” According to Adan Kovacsics, a translator of works by Kraus, when it comes to the fusion of information and spectacle, Kraus warned: “It is essential to understand what the spectacle is and that politics has fused with it.” The paradox, for Kovacsics, is that, as with Trump, “everything was in plain view,” but given the machinery and skill with which Nazism hollowed out language, the era was left without words or imagination to see what it was promoting.


Trump uttered over 30,000 lies in his first term, according to The Washington Post. To understand how he has dissolved the relationship between accountability and public discourse, no need to look further than the Financial Times which quoted what an evangelical leader said about Trump days after Biden’s catastrophic debate on CNN: “As President of the United States, he kept every single promise he made to us.” The next day, FT journalist Martin Wolf pointed out that Trump’s ability “to define the truth for his followers is an example of the Führerprinzip — the idea that the leader defines the truth.” Wolf is alluding here to German jurist Carl Schmitt, one of the most influential thinkers on the new right, and his essay, The Fuhrer Protects the Law. Whoever believes that the analogy is an exaggeration, and that Trump does not even have a Schmitt, should know that perhaps Adrian Vermeule, the Harvard professor who promotes an “illiberal legalism” will suffice. The Supreme Court has already said that Trump is above the law.


Kraus understood that the aim of the message relayed by Nazi propaganda was not so much to appropriate “the atrocities as the clarifications,” just as Trump does not seek to appropriate anything in particular, except media attention, i.e. everything. When the real world ceases to be the reference, and speeches are only compared to each other, the triumph of truly self-referential politics becomes inevitable. The news is not that his running mate baptized him in 2016 as the “Hitler of the United States,” but that, if it was a criticism back then, today J.D. Vance could repeat it as praise and still appear coherent, because denouncing contradiction in Trump’s world makes no sense — contradiction is Trump’s modus operandi.

Voegelin argues that it was against this background of indifference that National Socialism also triumphed, and relies on Kraus, and his dissection of the “doublespeak of Germany,” to try to “refute all the lies that have been told about [the concentration camps], that is, the second reality elaborated by (…) the German episcopate.” Hitler’s rise to power also highlighted the failure of Social Democracy, including Austrian Social Democracy which, even when it witnessed German comrades tortured and murdered, still preferred to oppose the Austrian Christian Democratic government rather than the German National Socialists.

“Devoted to the pastime of palaver and tactics, they have lost almost all material gains,” Kraus wrote of the Social Democrats and the Social Democratic intellectuals, who believed “they could break [the] magic circle [of Nazism] by means of the Constitutional Court.” Consequently, Kraus supported the Austrian Christian-Democratic Chancellor: anything other than Hitler.

Censored by The Space Review

SLS and Orion are needed to provide single launch heavy lift capabilities and cislunar crew transportation for NASA.
Right now the only equivalent capabilities to both vehicles are being developed in China.
It is baffling how many supposed space fans are actively advocating for the death of the public US human spaceflight program that traces its roots back to Mercury, Gemini and Apollo.

Not baffling at all…it is the Reagan Revolution that made money the god of this world. Google “Market Fundamentalism” and all will be revealed by Naomi Oreskes.
Only a democratic government cares for all of it’s citizens instead of only a tiny minority of “wealth creators.” Only a democracy can legislate taxing and regulating the super-rich and enable an immense public works energy project like Space Solar Power.

The path we are on is likely to burn civilization to the ground. Climate Change may kill half the people on this planet by way of war, famine, and disease….and hero to zero Elon and his fanboys will share responsibility for this catastrophe as they could have gone far to stop it. In fact, several silicon valley types are all about a partial genocide as an “adjustment”….they are called accelerationists.

NewSpace is about making money….not really about space except as a means to that end. Conflating satellite entrepreneurship with space exploration and colonization is a NewSpace marketing ploy. Not Space Exploration Technologies; Satellite Exploitation Technologies corp.

——————————————————————————————————————————————

The problem the Spruce Goose was designed to address existed alright.….

“Elon is a genius and has no fantasies about the internet.” Well, 44 billion for twitter would tend to contradict that portrayal of your Tony Stark/John Galt/Howard Roark fantasy. The rest of your musings on history and China are similar. You simply demonstrate how unacquainted with reality you have become.

We are presently, I hope, nearing the end of the Reagan Revolution and may soon be going to a more “Nordic Model” of mixed economy policies. The list of best places to live on this planet, that America continues to slide down, are more like “The New Deal” than Ayn Rand’s sci-fi invisible rich people paradise. Even better than Musk City on Mars. Neoliberal propaganda is wearing thin as citizens cannot afford groceries, but billionaires can literally go on recreational space-walk missions burning hundreds of millions of dollars for their hobby…while paying little or no taxes.

A “mixed economy” walks a tightrope between capitalist competition and socialist cooperation and in the last century, due also to favorable geopolitical circumstances, created the wealthiest middle class in history. I know this because in the 60’s my father was an aircraft mechanic with no college degree, and supported our large family on one income, owned a house and two cars, and retired with a generous pension. You will find those countries high on the list of best places to live are comparable to our golden age. America is no longer high on that list but is high on the list of billionaires…a new gilded age that regresses to a previous century. Those very few demi-gods who pay millions, pennies to them, to convince the rest of us that greed is good.
Which brings us to the Moon.

The only path to humankind expanding off-world and thus lessening our risk of extinction, is an imperative similar to the soviet threat to American capitalism signaled by Sputnik. That clear and present danger, the greatest existing threat to civilization…Climate Change. Any of the favorable geopolitical circumstances previously mentioned are fast evaporating. The only path to expanding into space is Space Solar Power by way of lunar resources as the solution to Climate Change. By de-industrialization; relocating almost the entire energy industry to the Moon. An immense project similar to fighting fascism in World War II. The ROI? Civilization does not melt down into a dystopian nightmare. Not even farmers being able to play video games in Nebraska can beat that.

——————————————————————————————————————————————–

———————————————————————————————————————————————


Gary’s expressed beliefs are essentially religious in nature. He has conjured up an entire fantasy future – from which he brooks no deviation – based on worship of the late Dr. O’Neill. O’Neill is God and Gary is his Prophet.

Framing this as the Musk Cult vs the O’Neill Cult is….not really going to fly. There is no O’Neill Cult because his concept was sound and unfortunately went against fossil fuel interests and an emerging neoliberal wave that became the Reagan Revolution. The resulting second Gilded Age has allowed the rise of multi-billionaires, one of whom happened to make rockets, satellites, and gaming the government for corporate welfare his forte.

I did not conjure up any of that.

———————————————————————————————————————————————

And it’s also why we haven’t been back in a half-century. Politicians, as a class, are vision-less and fickle. The settling of the American West was largely done by private sector actors. The settling of space will be as well.

The settling of the American west was enabled by genocide and military force. Landing on the Moon was enabled largely by technology created by a genocidal fascist dictatorship. “Vision” is seeing history for what it is and learning how to not make the same mistakes over and over. You do not get that. Politicians as the enemy is classic totalitarian propaganda. Orwellian reverse-speak like war is peace, slavery is freedom…. your democratically elected government is actually the opposite. Riiiight.

Their Plan is Crystal Clear

MSNBC’s Rachel Maddow in 2019 (Creative Commons)
MSNBC’s Rachel Maddow in 2019 (Creative Commons)
© provided by AlterNet
When a reporter asked 2024 Democratic presidential nominee Kamala Harris if she still considered herself the “underdog” despite polls showing her with small single-digit leads over Republican Donald Trump, the vice president responded, without hesitation, that yes, she does. Harris cautioned that it’s still a close race.

Nonetheless, Harris is quite competitive in many of the national and battleground state polls released in mid-August. And her supporters are hoping that the 2024 Democratic National Convention in Chicago will increase her momentum.

But in an op-ed/guest essay published by the New York Times on August 19 — the opening day of the convention — MSNBC’s Rachel Maddow lays out a troubling scenario in which Harris wins the electoral vote and MAGA Republicans do everything they can to overturn the election results.

Maddow notes that back in December 1960 — three weeks after Democrat John F. Kennedy defeated Republican Richard Nixon in that year’s presidential election — far-right white supremacist Gerald L.K. Smith proposed a “nutball campaign to overturn the 1960 election.”
Smith’s message only had a small fringe audience, but in 2024, Maddow warns, many Trump supporters at the state, federal and local levels are determined to try something similar if he loses.

“Election boards across the country now include Republican officials who have not only propounded Mr. Trump’s lies about the last presidential election being ‘stolen,’ they have tested how far they can go in denying the certification of the vote,” Maddow explains. “Republicans tried this ploy more than two dozen times in at least eight states since 2020.”

Maddow fears “legal challenges” and “certification refusals” from MAGA Republicans if Harris wins key battleground states like Pennsylvania, Georgia, Arizona and Michigan.

“The point of these certification refusals may not be to falsify or flip a result, but simply to prevent the emergence of one,” Maddow warns. “If one or more states fail to produce official results, blocking any candidate from reaching 270 electoral votes, the 12th Amendment prescribes Gerald L.K. Smith’s dream scenario: a vote in the newly elected House of Representatives to determine the presidency.”

Maddow continues, “Each state delegation would get one vote; today, Republicans control 26 state delegations; Democrats control 22;
and two are evenly divided…. No one should be surprised when certification refusals happen or when they are then exploited to try to maximize chaos and upset.”